Abstract

During offshore construction activities that produce underwater sound, mitigation zones are established to define protective monitoring areas for fauna in the vicinity and to establish whether animals may be exposed to sound levels exceeding regulatory criteria. Traditionally, mitigation zones have been determined by estimating the range within which the sound levels remain above given thresholds. These statically defined “acoustic ranges” have drawbacks, especially for criteria based on cumulative metrics such as SEL for marine mammal injury. A threshold distance derived solely from the acoustic footprint of a source is inadequate in establishing whether an animal moving through a (possibly time-varying) sound field would exceed a time-dependent exposure criterion. An approach to defining mitigation zones based on an understanding of the animals’ movement relative to the sound source overcomes the limitations of the static range calculation. The radial distance from a source that accounts for the exposures above threshold, or 'exposure range', can be estimated statistically from path-dependent sound exposure estimates generated through animal movement modeling. Exposure ranges can be calculated by this method also for moving and multiple sources. We present example scenarios comparing acoustic and exposure ranges in the context of seismic surveys and pile driving activities.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.