Abstract

How food webs are structured has major implications for their stability and dynamics. While poorly studied to date, arctic food webs are commonly assumed to be simple in structure, with few links per species. If this is the case, then different parts of the web may be weakly connected to each other, with populations and species united by only a low number of links. We provide the first highly resolved description of trophic link structure for a large part of a high-arctic food web. For this purpose, we apply a combination of recent techniques to describing the links between three predator guilds (insectivorous birds, spiders, and lepidopteran parasitoids) and their two dominant prey orders (Diptera and Lepidoptera). The resultant web shows a dense link structure and no compartmentalization or modularity across the three predator guilds. Thus, both individual predators and predator guilds tap heavily into the prey community of each other, offering versatile scope for indirect interactions across different parts of the web. The current description of a first but single arctic web may serve as a benchmark toward which to gauge future webs resolved by similar techniques. Targeting an unusual breadth of predator guilds, and relying on techniques with a high resolution, it suggests that species in this web are closely connected. Thus, our findings call for similar explorations of link structure across multiple guilds in both arctic and other webs. From an applied perspective, our description of an arctic web suggests new avenues for understanding how arctic food webs are built and function and of how they respond to current climate change. It suggests that to comprehend the community-level consequences of rapid arctic warming, we should turn from analyses of populations, population pairs, and isolated predator–prey interactions to considering the full set of interacting species.

Highlights

  • How interaction networks are structured comes with major implications for both their stability and dynamics (e.g., Thebault and Fontaine 2010)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • This study shows the members of an arctic food web to be linked to each other through versatile trophic interactions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

How interaction networks are structured comes with major implications for both their stability and dynamics (e.g., Thebault and Fontaine 2010). The distribution of biotic interactions has often been discussed in terms of specialism versus generalism, that is, as a description of how many other nodes each node in the web interacts with. In this context, it has been suggested that species in species-rich communities are generally embedded in a lower number of biotic interactions than are species in species-poor communities, resulting in a higher generalism in species-poor communities at high latitudes (MacArthur 1972; Schemske 2009). Some recent findings from networks of antagonistic interactions suggest that there may be no emergent relationship between the degree of specialism at a community-level and local species richness (Lewinsohn and Roslin 2008; Morris et al 2014)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call