Abstract
AbstractMediation is often used in North America to resolve public policy conflicts. Its basic techniques are well understood, and its successes are well documented. Beyond the Western European context, however, we know much less about the cross‐cultural applicability of this process. This article chronicles an environmental mediation in a Central European nation that tested the transportability of North American public policy dispute resolution processes into a region with a radically different history that is now undergoing dynamic change. It offers a snapshot of the advantages and limitations of using mediation in cultures that lack our traditions of process neutrality and bureaucratic accountability.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
