Abstract

Abstract.  Recent ‘open‐economy industrial organization’ literature finds export orientation enhances the weight of post‐merger international competitive gains, favouring lenient domestic merger policy. However, mergers seldom generate the ‘significant synergies’ supportive of international competitive gains. Since a joint‐economies‐of‐production effect suggests domestic mergers tend to generate international competitive losses (not gains), export orientation favours strict (not lenient) domestic merger policy. We show how non‐synergistic domestic mergers in the presence of international sales might reduce national welfare and incur stringent merger reviews. A panel data set of U.S. merger policy by manufacturing sector, 1990–2001, empirically supports export orientation, leading to strict merger policy. JEL classification: L40, F10

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call