Abstract

This paper presents a study of the visual properties of natural and Amerindian cultural landscapes in late pre-colonial East-Guadeloupe and of how these visual properties affected social interactions. Through a review of descriptive and formal visibility studies in Caribbean archaeology, it reveals that the ability of visual properties to affect past human behaviour is frequently evoked but the more complex of these hypotheses are rarely studied formally. To explore such complex hypotheses, the current study applies a range of techniques: total viewsheds, cumulative viewsheds, visual neighbourhood configurations and visibility networks. Experiments were performed to explore the control of seascapes, the functioning of hypothetical smoke signalling networks, the correlation of these visual properties with stylistic similarities of material culture found at sites and the change of visual properties over time. The results of these experiments suggest that only few sites in Eastern Guadeloupe are located in areas that are particularly suitable to visually control possible sea routes for short- and long-distance exchange; that visual control over sea areas was not a factor of importance for the existence of micro-style areas; that during the early phase of the Late Ceramic Age networks per landmass are connected and dense and that they incorporate all sites, a structure that would allow hypothetical smoke signalling networks; and that the visual properties of locations of the late sites Morne Souffleur and Morne Cybèle-1 were not ideal for defensive purposes. These results led us to propose a multi-scalar hypothesis for how lines of sight between settlements in the Lesser Antilles could have structured past human behaviour: short-distance visibility networks represent the structuring of navigation and communication within landmasses, whereas the landmasses themselves served as focal points for regional navigation and interaction. We conclude by emphasising that since our archaeological theories about visual properties usually take a multi-scalar landscape perspective, there is a need for this perspective to be reflected in our formal visibility methods as is made possible by the methods used in this paper.

Highlights

  • This paper aims to explore transformations of indigenous social networks in late precolonial East-Guadeloupe from the perspective of visibility: a study of the visual properties of natural and Amerindian cultural landscapes, and of how these visual properties affected social interactions

  • For all total viewshed and visual neighbourhood configuration results, locations with results higher than one standard deviation added to the mean will be treated as locations from which ‘a larger area’ can be seen or that have ‘higher visibility’

  • We started this paper by questioning how visual properties of natural and cultural landscapes in East-Guadeloupe affected human behaviour in pre-colonial times, with regards to interactions between communities, and whether these visual properties and roles changed over time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper aims to explore transformations of indigenous social networks in late precolonial East-Guadeloupe from the perspective of visibility: a study of the visual properties of natural and Amerindian cultural landscapes, and of how these visual properties affected social interactions. The intervisibility of most Caribbean islands is believed to have played a structuring role in establishing social relationships (Hofman et al 2007). The study of visibility patterns is considered an approach to understand one aspect of the social networks that connected indigenous communities in the past. How exactly did visual properties of the natural and cultural landscapes of East-Guadeloupe affect human behaviour in pre-colonial times? How did visual properties and their roles in Amerindian cultural landscapes change over time? How exactly did visual properties of the natural and cultural landscapes of East-Guadeloupe affect human behaviour in pre-colonial times? How did these structures enable or hinder interactions between communities? And how did visual properties and their roles in Amerindian cultural landscapes change over time?

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call