Abstract

This study explores thematic progressions in two excerpts from Amma Darko’s Faceless. The study aims at looking into the different types of thematic progressions used in the selected excerpts to decode there-from the deep meanings linguistically encoded by the author. The study further aims at examining how the different thematic progressions used in the studied texts contribute to their cohesion and contextual coherence. The research appeals to the mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology. Via this method, the number of thematic progression patterns identified has been quantified per excerpt to pave the way to the interpretation of the findings that ensued. The study has arrived at impressive results. Among several others available in the interpretation of the findings subsection, Amma Darko has purposefully not used the Split-Rheme Pattern to avoid a complex writing style that would make her writing not accessible to her readership. The simple linear thematic progression and the overriding theme reiteration patterns extensively used in both texts have allowed the author to emphasize the key thematic points of the studied texts. Moreover, the theme reiteration development strategy used in both texts has provided them with clear focuses. Some of these include skin bleaching, tradition and marriage in Africa, street children, women’s life conditions in Ghana to name but a few. For deeper meanings decoding in the studied excerpts, further studies on discourse-semantics, contextual coherence, conjunctive and lexical relations, as well as experiential and interpersonal meanings could pick up from this article findings.

Highlights

  • There are several ways of developing a text cohesively and coherently

  • The theme reiteration development strategy used in both texts has provided them with clear focuses

  • The collected data clearly show that the author Amma Darko has adopted the simple linear thematic progression and the constant theme progression patterns to weave the cohesive and coherent ties in her selected texts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are several ways of developing a text cohesively and coherently. As a matter of fact, Halliday (1985:302-9) acknowledges three main types of text development namely www.macrothink.org/ijl 1162021, Vol 13, No 6 elaboration, extension and enhancement. Eggins (2004:324) admits other methods of text development called thematic progressions. There are several ways of developing a text cohesively and coherently. As a matter of fact, Halliday (1985:302-9) acknowledges three main types of text development namely www.macrothink.org/ijl 116. 2021, Vol 13, No 6 elaboration, extension and enhancement. Eggins (2004:324) admits other methods of text development called thematic progressions. This study is focused on these ones. Thematic progressions are concerned with how thematic elements follow each other. Though other scholars (Belmonte & McCabe-Hidalgo, 1998; Wang, 2007; Li & Fan, 2008; Tan & Sun, 2010; Zhang & Li, 2009)) recognize other types of thematic progressions, this study focuses on only three types: theme reiteration, zig-zag and multiple-rheme thematic developments

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.