Abstract

Observations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite missionprovide quantitative estimates of the global water budget components. However, these estimatesare uncertain as they show discrepancies when different parameters are used in the processing ofthe GRACE data. We examine trends in ocean mass, ice loss from Antarctica, Greenland, arcticislands and trends in water storage over land and glaciers from GRACE data (2005–2015) andexplore the associated uncertainty. We consider variations in six different GRACE processingparameters, namely the processing centre of the raw GRACE solutions, the geocentre motion,the Earth oblateness, the filtering, the leakage correction and the glacial isostatic adjustment(GIA). Considering all possible combinations of the different processing parameters leads toan ensemble of 1500 post-processed GRACE solutions, which is assumed to cover a significantpart of the uncertainty range of GRACE estimates. The ensemble-mean trend in all globalwater budget components agree within uncertainties with previous estimates based on differentsources of observations. The uncertainty in the global water budget is±0.27 mm yr−1[at the 90per cent confidence level (CL)] over 2005–2015. We find that the uncertainty in the geocentremotion and GIA corrections dominate the uncertainty in GRACE estimate of the globalwater budget. Their contribution to the uncertainty in GRACE estimate is respectively±0.21and±0.12 mm yr−1(90 per cent CL). This uncertainty in GRACE estimate implies anuncertainty in the net warming of the ocean and the Earth energy budget of±0.25 W m−2(90per cent CL) when inferred using the sea level budget approach.

Highlights

  • The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft-und Raumfahrt has been providing precise, time-varying measurements of the Earth’s gravitational field since 2002 (Tapley et al 2004)

  • We considered variations in six different processing parameters namely the processing centre of the raw GRACE solutions, the geocentre motion and C2,0 corrections, the filtering, the leakage correction and the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) correction

  • With all possible combinations of the different processing parameters we computed an ensemble of 1500 post-processed GRACE solutions from which we evaluated the trends in global water budget components and their associated uncertainty

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft-und Raumfahrt has been providing precise, time-varying measurements of the Earth’s gravitational field since 2002 (Tapley et al 2004). Previous studies have noted significant differences in the water budget components estimates when different GRACE solutions from different data processing centres are used or when different post-processing is applied to the data (e.g. Gardner et al 2013, for glacier mass changes; Barletta et al 2013, Velicogna & Wahr 2013 for ice sheets mass changes; Quinn & Ponte 2010, Chambers & Bonin 2012, for ocean mass changes and Reager et al 2016; for the terrestrial water storage changes). Previous studies have used a similar ensemble approach based on different GRACE solutions and different post-processing to assess the uncertainty in GRACE estimates but they all focused on a single component of the water budget such as the ocean mass change (Quinn & Ponte 2010; Chambers & Bonin 2012), the ice sheet mass changes (Velicogna & Wahr 2013; Chen et al 2015b) or the glacier mass changes (Gardner et al 2013). We prefer to use the mascon solutions for comparison (see Section 4.3)

GRACE data
Geocentre motion and Earth oblateness
Filtering
Leakage correction
GIA correction
Statistical method to evaluate GRACE uncertainty
Uncertainty related to the geocentre motion correction
Uncertainty related to the filtering
Uncertainty related to the leakage correction
Uncertainty related to the GIA correction
Total uncertainty
Impact of the geocentre motion in the global water budget
Comparison with previous estimates
Findings
Comparison with mascons solutions
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.