Abstract

While traditional microplankton community assessments focus primarily on phytoplankton and protozooplankton, the last decade has witnessed a growing recognition of photo-phago mixotrophy (performed by mixoplankton) as an important nutritional route among plankton. However, the trophic classification of plankton and subsequent analysis of the trophic composition of plankton communities is often subjected to the historical dichotomy. We circumvented this historical dichotomy by employing a 24 year-long time series on abiotic and protist data to explore the trophic composition of protist communities in the Southern North Sea. In total, we studied three different classifications. Classification A employed our current knowledge by labeling only taxa documented to be mixoplankton as such. In a first trophic proposal (classification B), documented mixoplankton and all phototrophic taxa (except for diatoms, cyanobacteria, and colonial Phaeocystis) were classified as mixoplankton. In a second trophic proposal (classification C), documented mixoplankton as well as motile, phototrophic taxa associated in a principle component analysis with documented mixoplankton were classified as mixoplankton. In all three classifications, mixoplankton occurred most in the inorganic nutrient-depleted, seasonally stratified environments. While classification A was still subjected to the traditional dichotomy and underestimated the amount of mixoplankton, our results indicate that classification B overestimated the amount of mixoplankton. Classification C combined knowledge gained from the other two classifications and resulted in a plausible trophic composition of the protist community. Using results of classification C, our study provides a list of potential unrecognized mixoplankton in the Southern North Sea. Furthermore, our study suggests that low turbidity and the maturity of an ecosystem, quantified using a newly proposed index of ecosystem maturity (ratio of organic to total nitrogen), provide an indication on the relevance of mixoplankton in marine protist communities.

Highlights

  • Plankton communities form the base of all open-water ecosystems

  • By exploring three trophic classifications, this study helps close a gap between plankton community assessments within varying abiotic environments and our developing knowledge of mixoplankton

  • We did not discover any basin-wide yearly trends in the trophic composition of the protist community. This is consistent with the absence of basin-wide yearly trends in abiotic parameters as the North Sea system is mainly driven through large scale hydrodynamics and terrestrial runoff (Emeis et al, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plankton communities form the base of all open-water ecosystems. Traditionally, organisms of these communities have been primarily classified into either phototrophs or heterotrophs. The dichotomous plankton classification has been increasingly questioned, and the photo-phago mixotrophic potential (i.e., the combination of photo- and phagotrophy in one cell) of many phytoplankton and protozooplankton species is being recognized (Flynn et al, 2013; Glibert, 2016; Mitra et al, 2016; Stoecker et al, 2017). Mixoplankton have the potential to access more resources than are available to pure phyto- and protozooplankton (Barton et al, 2013; Stoecker et al, 2017). By employing both photoand phagotrophy, mixoplankton can overcome the limitations of low inorganic nutrient environments that restrict the growth of phytoplankton or prey limitations that restrict the growth of protozooplankton. The different types of mixoplankton have varying abiotic and biotic requirements (Anschütz and Flynn, 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call