Abstract

The persistent policy of successive Sudanese governments in favouring large-scale agricultural investments at the expense of traditional land use is creating material differences among significant groups of the population. A significant share of this type of investment falls within the territories of the communal rangelands of the country. The aim of this paper is to provide analytical insights of the geographical allocation and the temporal evolution of land grabbing on the expanses of communal land utilized by local inhabitants in Butana area in eastern Sudan. The study relies on multi-temporal Landsat satellite imagery (2000, 2005, 2009, and 2014), ground surveys, and key informant interviews. The results show that large-scale mechanized agriculture (LSMA) in Butana communal rangeland increased incrementally from 2.5% in 2000 to 17.6% in 2014. The starting location of the expansion of LSMA was in surrounding valleys. From the images, it is clear that land grabbing is converting the natural vegetation cover of Butana communal rangeland into spatially fragmented patches. Large-scale farmers (LSFs) involved in the process included wealthy pastoralists who own large numbers of livestock and absentee farmers who rely on hired representatives to manage their agricultural operations. Without a fundamental change in governmental policy, which currently turns a blind eye to the illegal activities of LSFs on communal rangeland, the gloomy scenario of land-based conflict may erupt in the eastern part of the country.

Highlights

  • The ever-increasing demand for land resources is reshaping landscapes all over the global south at an unprecedented rate

  • To provide empirical evidence to better inform the debate, this paper focuses on Butana communal rangeland in eastern Sudan which is classified as marginal for agricultural production and where by law large-scale mechanized agriculture (LSMA) activities are illegal (Sulieman 2015)

  • The percentage of area under cultivation in Butana rangeland increased from 2.5%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ever-increasing demand for land resources is reshaping landscapes all over the global south at an unprecedented rate. This is due to a misconception that the economic benefits of large-scale investment will exceed those of pre-existing traditional production systems, such as pastoralism (Behnke and Kerven 2013). The losses caused by this large-scale development exceed - or diminish considerably - the gains (Schlee 2013). Geographical location of Agricultural practices (crop husbandry) Networking land. - Start to acquire land in the early - All over the area, with. - Mixture of farmers with experience in irrigated agriculture and pastoralists owning large number of livestock. - Long experience in rain-fed agriculture - Farmers are fully engaged. - Present throughout the year - Have good infrastructure - Control weeds by herbicides and mechanical means - Leave crop residues for grazing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call