Abstract

It has recently been observed that certain objects, when viewed or imagined in isolation, evoke a strong sense of three-dimensional local space surrounding them (space-defining (SD) objects), while others do not (space-ambiguous (SA) objects), and this is associated with engagement of the parahippocampal cortex (PHC). But activation of the PHC is classically associated with scene stimuli. The comparable neural response within PHC to both full scenes and single SD objects, led us to hypothesise that SD objects might play a more critical role in the construction and maintenance of scene representations than SA objects. To test this we used scene construction and deconstruction paradigms, where participants gradually built and maintained scenes using SD, SA and background (wall, floors) items. By examining the order in which each item was added (and later removed) to (and from) a scene, we could estimate the significance of each item type. In two different experiments, participants chose SD over SA objects and background items as the first and most critical item in their constructed scenes and, more generally, selected SD objects earlier than SA objects across the scene construction process. When deconstructing scenes, participants retained significantly more SD objects than SA objects, and the last remaining object across all scenes was highly likely to be an SD object. SD objects therefore enjoy a privileged role in scene construction and maintenance, and appear to be an essential building block of scenes.

Highlights

  • IntroductionVision, cognitive, and neuro-scientists have studied the nature, perception and memory of scenes (Bar, 2004; Biederman, 1972; Biederman, Mezzanotte, & Rabinowitz, 1982; Bisiach & Luzzatti, 1978; Enns & Rensink, 1990; Epstein & Kanwisher, 1998; Henderson & Hollingworth, 1999; Intraub & Richardson, 1989; Mandler & Parker, 1976; Oliva & Schyns, 1997; Potter & Faulconer, 1975)

  • When viewed or imagined in isolation, SD objects evoke a strong sense of three-dimensional local space, and produce significantly greater activity in bilateral posterior parahippocampal cortex than SA objects (Mullally & Maguire, 2011)

  • The comparable neural response within parahippocampal cortex (PHC) to both full scenes and single SD objects, led us to hypothesise that SD objects might play a more critical role in the construction and maintenance of scene representations than SA objects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vision, cognitive, and neuro-scientists have studied the nature, perception and memory of scenes (Bar, 2004; Biederman, 1972; Biederman, Mezzanotte, & Rabinowitz, 1982; Bisiach & Luzzatti, 1978; Enns & Rensink, 1990; Epstein & Kanwisher, 1998; Henderson & Hollingworth, 1999; Intraub & Richardson, 1989; Mandler & Parker, 1976; Oliva & Schyns, 1997; Potter & Faulconer, 1975). What specific scene attributes are represented within the PHC has been widely debated (Ranganath & Ritchey, 2012), and numerous hypotheses, which focus on different aspects of scenes, have been proposed. These include their spatial layout or global structure (Epstein, 2008; Epstein et al, 1999; Park, Brady, Greene, & Oliva, 2011; Walther, Chai, Caddigan, Beck, & Fei-Fei, 2011), contextual (Bar, 2004; Bar, Aminoff, & Schacter, 2008) or categorical The distinctive network of brain regions (which includes the PHC), activated when participants actively imagine complex, coherent scenes (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007; Summerfield, Hassabis, & Maguire, 2010), recall episodic memories, plan for the future or engage in spatial navigation (Buckner & Carroll, 2007; Hassabis & Maguire, 2007; Schacter, Addis, & Buckner, 2008; Spreng, Mar, & Kim, 2009), suggests that understanding scene processing in regions such as PHC may be key to elucidating a range of cognitive functions (Hassabis & Maguire, 2007, 2009)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call