Abstract
Background: Mechanisms of mRNA fate decisions play an important role in determining if a given mRNA will be translated, stored or degraded upon arrival to cytoplasm. Sbp1 is an important RGG-motif containing protein that is implicated in affecting mRNA decapping and translation. Sbp1 represses translation by binding eIF4G1 through its RGG-motif and activates decapping when overexpressed. In this report we have assessed the genetic interaction of Sbp1 with decapping activators such as Dhh1, Pat1 and Scd6. We have further analyzed the importance of different domains and specific conserved residues of Sbp1 in translation repression activity. Method: Sequence alignment was performed to identify conserved aromatic residues to be mutated. Using site-directed mutagenesis several point mutations and domain deletions was created in Sbp1 expressed under a galactose-inducible promoter. The mutants were tested for their ability to cause growth defect upon over-expression. The ability of Sbp1 to affect over expression mediated growth defect of other decapping activators was tested using growth assay. Live cell imaging was done to study localization of Sbp1 and its RRM-deletion mutants to RNA granules upon glucose starvation. Results: Mutation of several aromatic residues in the RGG-motif and that of the phosphorylation sites in the RRM domain of Sbp1 did not affect the growth defect phenotype. Deletion of another eIF4G1-binding RGG-motif protein Scd6 does not affect the ability of Sbp1 to cause growth defect. Moreover, absence of Sbp1 did not affect the growth defect phenotypes observed upon overexpression of decapping activators Dhh1 and Pat1. Strikingly deletion of both the RRM domains (RRM1 and RRM2) and not the RNP motifs within them compromised the growth defect phenotype. Sbp1 mutant lacking both RRM1 and RRM2 was highly defective in localizing to RNA granules. Conclusion: This study identifies an important role of RRM domains independent of RNP motif in Sbp1 repression activity.
Highlights
Mechanisms of mRNA fate decisions play an important role in determining if a given mRNA will be translated, stored or degraded upon arrival to cytoplasm
Aromatic residues surrounded by charged residues (Figure 2A) have been implicated in RNA binding for example in the case of the RNP1 and RNP2 sequence motifs present in RNA Recognition Motifs (RRMs) (Maris et al, 2005)
This led us to hypothesize that the conserved aromatic residues in the RGG-motif of Sbp1 could contribute to the repression activity of Sbp1 presumably through binding RNA
Summary
Mechanisms of mRNA fate decisions play an important role in determining if a given mRNA will be translated, stored or degraded upon arrival to cytoplasm. Results: Mutation of several aromatic residues in the RGG-motif and that of the phosphorylation sites in the RRM domain of Sbp did not affect the growth defect phenotype. Deletion of another eIF4G1-binding RGG-motif protein Scd does not affect the ability of Sbp to cause growth defect. Absence of Sbp did not affect the growth defect phenotypes observed upon overexpression of decapping activators Dhh and Pat. Absence of Sbp did not affect the growth defect phenotypes observed upon overexpression of decapping activators Dhh and Pat1 Deletion of both the RRM domains (RRM1 and RRM2) and not the RNP motifs within them compromised the growth defect phenotype. Conclusion: This study identifies an important role of RRM domains independent of RNP motif in Sbp repression activity
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.