Abstract

This study explores the role information technology (IT) plays in organizational downsizing by studying two medium-sized American cities over a period of 10 years (1985-1995). Data were collected through 73 interviews, a questionnaire, and numerous documents. Four main findings emerged from the case studies. First, IT was found to facilitate organizational downsizing, but not to cause it. New City invested heavily in state-of-the-art IT over the years and more successfully downsized the organization than Old City, which lagged behind in IT investment and made no serious attempts to use IT as a tool to support strategic actions. Second, adverse environmental conditions triggered downsizing in both cities and determined the change strategies that managers used. When environmental pressures were mild (1985-1990), managers favored a convergent change strategy that resulted in limited downsizing efforts and small personnel reductions. In contrast, when environmental pressures were strong (1990-1995), managers of both cities engaged in strategic reorientation and in downsizing efforts that led to larger personnel reductions. Third, the role IT played in organizational downsizing varied according to the change strategy. IT was used to facilitate work redesign in a convergent change strategy and to facilitate more significant structural and work redesign in strategic reorientation. Fourth, more integrated and better use of IT allowed managers of New City to downsize more rationally and efficiently. It facilitated the transfer of personnel within departments, from middle management to the operations level, and across departments, from internally oriented to customer-oriented personnel. In doing so, managers of New City minimized operating costs while maintaining the same level of services. In contrast, IT in Old City did not facilitate such an agenda and managers downsized more superficially across the board, in all departments. Differences in IT consequences in the two cities are explained using the theory of slack resources in organizations.

Highlights

  • In today’s highly competitive and turbulent environment, downsizing continues to be used by organizations to reduce operating costs, increase flexibility, and improve responsiveness

  • Top management in New City heavily invested in information technology (IT) as a matter of policy throughout 1985–1995

  • This study indicates that assumptions about a straightforward causal relationship between IT and organizational downsizing are oversimplified

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In today’s highly competitive and turbulent environment, downsizing continues to be used by organizations to reduce operating costs, increase flexibility, and improve responsiveness. Organizational downsizing—the planned elimination of positions or jobs designed to improve organizational efficiency and/or effectiveness—is characterized by four main attributes It is undertaken purposively or intentionally, usually in response to environmental conditions such as economic slowdowns or hypercompetition (Budros 1999, DeWitt 1993, Freeman and Cameron 1993, Tomasko 1993). It involves reductions in personnel that might occur through direct elimination of jobs, or indirectly, as a result of eliminating functions, hierarchical levels, or entire units It is aimed at improving the efficiency and/or effectiveness of the organization (Freeman and Cameron 1993). When the work force is reduced, fewer employees are left to do the same amount of work and this alters what gets done, how it gets done, and how workers feel about the change in work processes (Freeman and Cameron 1993)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.