Exploring the relationship between corporate governance and firm's performance: Does political connection matter?

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of corporate board and audit committee characteristics on firm performance as measured by accounting‐based ratios (earnings per share, return on asset, and return on equity) as well as the market‐based measure (Tobin's Q). In addition, this research introduces political connections to examine whether it can moderate the relationship between corporate board characteristics and firm performance. The study reveals that a higher proportion of independent directors and CEO duality positively affected firm performance. However, board meetings and board financial experience have no affected firm performance. The study also shows that audit committee independence, audit committee size, and audit committee expertise are positively related to firm performance. In contrast, it finds no discernible impact of audit committee meetings on firm performance. Our findings also suggest that the beneficial influences of the corporate board, in terms of higher firm performance, are greater in firms with political connections. To the best of the researchers’ knowledge, this is almost certainly the first analysis to examine the relation between the corporate board, audit committee characteristics, and firm performance, and the moderating effect of political connection of this relationship.