Abstract
If computers or robots were to replace human scientists, should they adhere to our established principles of the Philosophy of Science? We have been taught to value consistency, Popperian falsifiability, and Occam’s razor (also known as the principle of parsimony). While these traditional philosophical principles are valuable, they might limit the exploration of complex phenomena that require more nuanced or multifaceted approaches. Specific formal contexts exist where these principles falter when confronted with reality, as traditional scientific methods may reduce cognitive power. This paper formally highlights the limitations of traditional scientific and philosophical principles through the mathematics of computability (which will be considered softly).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
