Abstract

The measurement of public service provision (PSP) performance and identification of its influencing variables are of great importance for the government to efficiently utilize public resources and provide more effective public services. However, existing studies have mainly focused on the efficiency to provide public services and ignored the effectiveness to improve public subjective well-being. To fill this gap, this study constructs a two-stage PSP conceptual model from the perspective of service production and consumption and develops a corresponding PSP performance evaluation indicator system to evaluate PSP efficiency, effectiveness, and comprehensive performance. The PSP performances of 35 major cities in China during 2011–2018 are calculated using the super efficiency network slack-based measure model. Moreover, the influencing factors of these performances are identified through the truncated regression model. Results indicate that the comprehensive performance of these cities is relatively low and shows a trend of decrease that is predominantly caused by provision efficiency. Owing to the absolute advantage in effectiveness and the catch-up effect in efficiency, cities in the western region perform the best in comprehensive performance, followed by the eastern region and then the central region. In addition, only seven cities achieve a balance between efficiency and effectiveness. Factors from economy, society, government, and public aspects have different impacts on PSP performances. On the basis of these findings, several policy suggestions are proposed. This study proposes a relatively comprehensive and accurate measurement framework of PSP performance that considers both efficiency and effectiveness and can help policymakers implement appropriate strategies promoting PSP in an efficient, effective, and sustainable manner.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call