Exploring the mechanisms responsible for afterload mismatch in severe aortic stenosis

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Afterload mismatch (AM) is defined as a reduced ejection fraction (EF) in the setting of severe aortic stenosis (AS) (aortic valve area (AVA) of < 1cm2), but with transaortic pressure gradients in the severe range. The pathomechanism underlying the impaired EF remains unclear, especially with regards to the impact of ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis, the role of afterload, and the integrity of the intrinsic contractile myocardial strength in AM. This knowledge gap unmasks a lack of understanding into the natural disease progression in AS. Purpose To characterise the morphological and functional contractile mechanics that distinguishes patients with reduced EF from patients with preserved EF in the setting of AS with high transvalvular gradients. Methods A prospective comparative analysis was performed on 21 sequential cases of patients with severe AS, 9 with AM (AVA < 1.0cm2; MG > 40mmHg; EF < 50%) and 12 with normal flow high gradient (NFHG) AS (AVA < 1.0cm2; MG > 40mmHg; EF > 50%). Patients with concomitant valve lesions or previously diagnosed myocardial infarction, were excluded. Myocardial morphology, function and tissue characteristics were evaluated using a) transthoracic echocardiography, b) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and c) an invasive hemodynamic study with pressure-volume loop derived data. Results Intrinsic load independent contractile muscle function parameters were similar between AM and NFHG AS (p-value non-significant for cardiac index, dP/dT(max), preload recruitable stroke work slope, end systolic pressure volume relationship slope and Starling contractile index slope). Afterload indices as assessed by peak systolic wall stress and valvuloarterial impedance were significantly higher in AM cases compared to NFHG AS (32.5 vs 19.9 N/cm2; p < 0.01 and 4.8 vs 3.4mmHg/ml; P = 0.05). This was driven by disproportionally higher degrees of valvular stenosis in the AM group (valve area 0.46 vs 0.78cm2; p < 0.01). The AM group expressed a more advanced disease phenotype with more symptoms (NYHA 3.3 vs 2.3; p=0.02), more pulmonary hypertension (50 vs 30mmHg; p=0.04), and more extensive myocardial fibrosis (24% vs 13% of left ventricular mass; p=0.03) (see Figure 1). Neither more severe LVH nor higher degrees of fibrosis in the AM group, was associated with a demonstrable impairment in the intrinsic contractile muscle function. Conclusion Our data suggest that the central problem in AM is related to an excessively increased afterload, primarily driven by more severe valvular stenosis, with preserved intrinsic left ventricular contractile function. AM is characterised by more severe myocardial fibrosis, as a marker of a more advanced disease phenotype, but this did not translate into worse intrinsic contractile muscle function. The known time dependence of progressive valvular stenosis and myocardial fibrosis would suggest that AM is an intermediate phase between NFHG AS and so-called low flow low gradient severe AS.A more advanced phenotype