Abstract

Measuring brain activity in moving subjects is of great importance for investigating human behavior in ecological settings. For this purpose, EEG measures are applicable; however, technical modifications are required to reduce the typical massive movement artefacts. Four different approaches to measure EEG/ERPs during rowing were tested: (i) a purpose-built head-mounted preamplifier, (ii) a laboratory system with active electrodes, and a wireless headset combined with (iii) passive or (iv) active electrodes. A standard visual oddball task revealed very similar (within subjects) visual evoked potentials for rowing and rest (without movement). The small intraindividual differences between rowing and rest, in comparison to the typically larger interindividual differences in the ERP waveforms, revealed that ERPs can be measured reliably even in an athletic movement such as rowing. On the other hand, the expected modulation of the motor-related activity by force output was largely affected by movement artefacts. Therefore, for a successful application of ERP measures in movement research, further developments to differentiate between movement-related neuronal activity and movement-related artefacts are required. However, activities with small magnitudes related to motor learning and motor control may be difficult to detect because they are superimposed by the very large motor potential, which increases with force output.

Highlights

  • The investigation of brain functions with noninvasive methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetencephalography (MEG), electroencephalography (EEG), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is typically limited to laboratory settings

  • As in Study 1, the visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were very similar between rowing and rest, the P300 was smaller during rowing, and the intraindividual differences were much smaller than the interindividual differences

  • The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values were always higher for the rest condition (VEP mean at Oz: 0.315 vs. 0.135, t (2) = 11.7, p = 0.0072)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The investigation of brain functions with noninvasive methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnetencephalography (MEG), electroencephalography (EEG), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is typically limited to laboratory settings This is because the systems are very large and cannot be moved, and head movements must be avoided (fMRI, MEG), or head and body movements generate large movement artefacts. The Emotiv system integrates the hardware in a small and lightweight headset, in combination with a wireless data transmission via a USB dongle to a laptop or even an Android smartphone [6]. This system integrates a two-axis gyroscope that measures head rotations. A disposable baby-ECG electrode, which served as ground/DRL (driven right leg), was placed at the right anterior temple

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call