Abstract

The growing adoption of active learning techniques in physics courses requires that students productively engage in collaboration with their peers. Although studies in physics education research (PER) have addressed aspects of group work, the problem persists of how to engage students in collaborative work with appropriate self-awareness, adequate argumentation skills, openness to the views of others, and willingness to negotiate their ideas. In this article, we present intellectual humility (IH) as a new construct for PER to help advance our understanding and support of students’ collaboration with peers. We particularly focus on authentic group work engagement, where students must handle their intellectual shortcomings during discussions in order to make sense of physics and solve problems. The aim of our work is to formally introduce the construct of IH from a limitations-owning perspective and report on the results of a mixed-methods study investigating students’ learning experiences in introductory physics courses through an IH lens. The study provides quantitative evidence about how students gauge their own IH based on analysis of survey responses. We also provide an initial empirical foundation for facets of IH already present in the physics classroom from analysis of students’ reflections and researchers’ classroom observations. We find that students report high levels of love of learning, one characteristic of IH, however, our findings also point to students discomfort with intellectual limitations and inadequate handling of these shortcomings during group work. Our results suggest that students would benefit from learning spaces that welcome and encourage discussions around uncertainties, with minimal social risks that may be perceived as hindering their engagement.Received 18 February 2021Accepted 22 September 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020135Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.Published by the American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasEpistemology, attitudes, & beliefsPhysics Education Research

Highlights

  • The driver for recent instructional change in physics is not merely to change students’ views, and for them to achieve genuine understanding of science and how science is done

  • We suggest that intellectual humility (IH) offers a new lens for physics education research (PER) scholars to examine the subtleties of student engagement in discussions with peers and find ways for instructors to better equip students for collaboration

  • We offer new insights into the study of introductory physics group interactions with a focus on situations where students’ ideas are challenged and students must engage in productive discussions with others to resolve the issue

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The driver for recent instructional change in physics is not merely to change students’ views, and for them to achieve genuine understanding of science and how science is done. Students in introductory physics courses often hold firm conceptions of what physics is, based on both their school experiences and life outside of the classroom. Oftentimes, these conceptions do not align well with the true nature of the discipline [1]. Introductory physics courses must challenge false conceptions and aim for students to acquire content knowledge, and engage in science discovery through collaboration with peers [2]. Facilitating these actions in the classroom comprise the theory and educational reform movement known as active learning.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call