Abstract

Controlled mesocosm experiments can add substantially to our knowledge of the influence of environmental factors on freshwater assemblages by partitioning the possible effects of different drivers. Reporting results of such an experiment, Bray et al. (2019) concluded that effects of salinity on salt-sensitive stream invertebrates were substantially modified by interspecific biotic interactions with salt-tolerant invertebrates from a high-salinity stream. Chessman (2021) questioned this conclusion on three grounds: (1) confounding of the experimental design, (2) lack of evidence that purported diverse effects of biotic interactions were beyond mere stochastic variation, and (3) absence of mechanistic explanations for supposed effects grounded in organism biology and ecology. Chessman (2021) also conducted an independent statistical analysis of publicly available data from the experiment, which did not support the study’s conclusions. Kefford et al. (2022) dispute Chessman’s (2021) findings by analysing previously unpublished data from the experiment, which they claim demonstrates that the experimental design was not confounded, and criticise Chessman’s (2021) statistical analysis. Here, I respond to their new analysis and criticisms, explaining why they do not dispel any of the concerns expressed by Chessman (2021).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.