Abstract
In 2003, the UK government passed the Licensing Act for England and Wales. The Act provides a framework for regulating alcohol sale, including four licensing objectives with local governments having devolved responsibility for granting licences to sell alcohol. Members of the public can make representations of oppositions to licence applications. Applying the theories of the policy process, we explored the practices employed by licensing authorities when deciding on alcohol licences in situations of conflict between licence applicants and members of the public. Qualitative study comprising a framework analysis of in-depth semi-structured interviews and application of the theories of institutionalism, the advocacy coalition framework and role of ideas. Eleven local authorities in five regions in England in 2019. Purposive sample of 15 licensing officers, licensing subcommittee chairs, public health leads for licensing and police licensing officers. The interview schedule included mechanisms of public involvement in licensing, parties involved, the subject of conflicts and how licensing authorities made decisions. When members of the public opposed licence applications, licensing authorities employed three key decision-making practices: procedural fairness, partnership working and framing. The normativity of procedural fairness was an important institutional structure within which conflicts were resolved. Licensing authorities also worked in partnership with the involved parties, who often appeared as advocacy coalitions that shared beliefs and advanced specific issues to determine mutually acceptable solutions. At times, licensing authorities framed issues through ideational processes to solve problems. Licensing decision-making under the United Kingdom's Licensing Act for England and Wales appear in many cases to focus on resolution of conflicts between licence applicants and members of the public rather than on promotion of licensing objectives. This raises uncertainty regarding the impact of public involvement on reducing alcohol availability, but ultimately represents a pragmatic process that seeks to restore balance in powers, improve transparency in decision-making and empower communities.
Highlights
The density [1] and location of premises [2] and their hours and days of sale affect the level of alcohol consumption in a population [3, 4]
A cumulative impact policy is an instrument used by local governments in England and Wales to restrict the growth of alcohol premises in a local area by automatically refusing new alcohol premises licence applications unless the applicant can demonstrate that the addition of an alcohol premise will not add to existing crime, public disorder or harm to children in that area [8]
Act led to local policy decisions; we utilized institutionalism, the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) and role of ideas [21,22] to examine the decision-making process for alcohol premises licences opposed by the public
Summary
The density [1] and location of premises [2] and their hours and days of sale affect the level of alcohol consumption in a population [3, 4]. Act led to local policy decisions; we utilized institutionalism, the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) and role of ideas (theories that explain local implementation of national policy) [21,22] to examine the decision-making process for alcohol premises licences opposed by the public. Ideas include policy paradigms [23], notions of causal relations [29] and world views—forces shaping the perceived interests of stakeholders through ideational processes [23]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
