Abstract

Higher education institutions are typically designed for residential students (Attewell & Lavin, 2012; Jacoby, 2015), even though the majority of students at four-year colleges and universities commute to their campuses (Horn & Nevill, 2006). One part of the higher education structure is the co-curricular experience, and is a way for students to develop a sense of belonging on campus, which leads to positive outcomes like self-actualization and persistence (Strayhorn, 2012, 2019). Greek-letter organizations are one aspect of the co-curricular experience, yet are also typically designed with residential students in mind. These organizations, however, have been present at primarily commuter institutions and admitted commuter students for decades (Heida, 1986), yet very few studies have examined the experience of commuter students in Greek-letter organizations (e.g., Yearwood & Jones, 2012), and none have done so using qualitative research. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the experience of commuter students in Greek-letter organizations at primarily commuter public institutions, using sense of belonging as a conceptual framework. Nine alumni who were commuter students in Greek-letter organizations from four primarily commuter public higher education institutions were interviewed for this study. The primary research question for this study was: How do alumni who were commuter students and members of Greek-letter organizations at primarily commuter public institutions describe their member experience? Secondary research questions were: What comprised the experience of belonging for these alumni? What, if anything, lead to or detracted from their sense of belonging? And how, if at all, did their membership contribute to their sense of belonging on campus? To answer these questions, I engaged in semi-structured interviews with the participants, and analyzed the data using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Smith, Flowers, & Larkin, 2009). Four themes arose from the data: (1) seeking to belong, (2) personal connections, (3) welcoming and accepting members, and (4) belonging beyond the chapter. Using the findings, I developed recommendations for chapters and alumni advisors, college and university administrators, and Greek-letter organization national headquarters.

Highlights

  • The primary question is: How do alumni who were commuter students and members of Greek-letter organizations at primarily commuter public institutions describe their member experience? The secondary research questions are: 1. What comprised the experience of belonging for these alumni? 2

  • Using sense of belonging as a conceptual lens, the purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of commuter students in Greek-letter organizations at primarily commuter public institutions

  • The primary question is: How do alumni who were commuter students and members of Greek-letter organizations at primarily commuter public institutions describe their member experience? The secondary research questions are: (1) What comprised the experience of belonging for these alumni? (2) What, if anything, lead to or detracted from their sense of belonging? And (3) how, if at all, did their membership contribute to their sense of belonging on campus?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Commuter Students Commuter students are a diverse group that have typically been defined as any student who does not live in a residence that is owned by the institution (Jacoby, 2000b), and includes over 70% of students in four-year higher education (Horn & Nevill, 2006) When compared with their residential peers, commuter students are more likely to hold a variety of life roles (Burlison, 2015); work more hours (Graham, Socorro Hurtado & Gonyea, 2018; Newbold, Mehta, & Forbus, 2011); and be students of color (Graham et al.; Kuh et al, 2001), first-generation, and/or from lower socioeconomic status families (Gianoutsos & Rosser, 2014). Commuter students persist from their first-to-second year at similar rates as residential students, with academic and social integration being a more important predictor for retention than a student’s residence (Ishitani & Reid, 2015)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.