Abstract

This paper claims that a constraint-based theory (i.e, OT) can best account for the many manifestations of Focus in typologically diverse languages. We propose an interaction between Discourse Representation Theory (hereafter DRT) (Kamp, 1981; Kamp and Reyle, 1993) and Optimality Theory (OT) (Prince and Smolensky, 1993/2004) to best account for these facts, maintaining that constraint-ranking is the best way to achieve a descriptive and explanatorily adequate analysis of natural data. In particular, we provide a novel sketch of a theoretical account of natural languages that mark Focus morphologically but not prosodically. We also show that modular frameworks cannot account for the facts presented in this paper (see also Perlmutter, 1998 and Teeple, 2007). Thus, there is another advantage to our proposal which has been less frequently discussed but is perhaps more crucial. Our data and the analysis put forth here require parallel evaluation of syntax, phonology, and morphology, which we model within OT. Consequently, our data and analysis offer interesting insights into grammatical theory. The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides some background on Focus constructions and presents a selective review of the different ways in which Focus can be expressed in typologically different languages. Section 3 introduces DRT, the OT constraints and develops the analysis. We also present the data of relevant languages in this section. Section 4 summarizes our main claims and findings and draws attention to issues that do not appear to have been explicitly covered in previous research nor in the current paper, thus needing much attention in the future.

Highlights

  • This paper claims that a constraint-based theory (i.e, Optimality Theory (OT)) can best account for the many manifestations of Focus in typologically diverse languages

  • Our data and the analysis put forth here require parallel evaluation of syntax, phonology, and morphology, which we model within OT

  • For example, can we develop a descriptively adequate theory that effectively accounts for the myriad of possibilities and combinations of Focus while maintaining a theory that is explanatorily adequate in design and function? In the proceeding section we provide a novel generative approach that makes use of Kamp’s (1981) Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) in an interactive setting with violable constraints (i.e, Optimality Theory (OT))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper claims that a constraint-based theory (i.e, OT) can best account for the many manifestations of Focus in typologically diverse languages. We propose an interaction between Discourse Representation Theory (hereafter DRT) (Kamp, 1981; Kamp and Reyle, 1993) and Optimality Theory (OT) (Prince and Smolensky, 1993/2004) to best account for these facts, maintaining that constraint-ranking is the best way to achieve a descriptive and explanatorily adequate analysis of natural data. We show that modular frameworks cannot account for the facts presented in this paper (see Perlmutter, 1998 and Teeple, 2007). There is another advantage to our proposal which has been less frequently discussed but is perhaps more crucial.

The many manifestations of Focus
Pragmatics
Semantics
Syntax
Evidence for Syntactic Movement
Morphology
Constraints
Analysis
English
Hindi-Urdu
Q’anjob’al
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.