Abstract

The effects of informational masking (IM) can be recast as a question of which cues to sound source identity (auditory object formation) are most useful for overcoming IM. We hypothesize that individual differences are related to specific interactions of stimulus and listener-specific variables that determine the effectiveness of the auditory object formation process. Results from our laboratory generally support the well-established relationship between performance and stimulus variables such as spectrotemporal cues (in this case, voice differences) and spatial cues (talker locations). In addition, the listener-specific variables of age and hearing loss were found to interact with the stimulus variables and to be correlated with potential mediating variables such as interaural time sensitivity and minimum levels at which speech identification was possible. Future work will involve developing predictive models that focus on identifying the mediating variables responsible for increased susceptibility to IM and efficient tests to reveal these relationships in individual listeners. The clinical relevance of the ability to identify factors predictive of IM susceptibility will be discussed, including the potential for improved fitting of hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.