Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationships between economic development and environmental degradation regarding the emissions of CO2 and SO2 in Southeast Asia (SEA). The pooling data consist of 10 countries, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam, in the period 2003-2012. Furthermore, income elasticity of CO2 and SO2 emissions is computed for each country to observe the sensitivity of environmental degradation through the emissions of CO2 and SO2 brought by economic development. The results indicate that CO2 displays an inverted U-shape pattern, whereas SO2 has decreased at an increasing rate since 2003. It is expected that SO2 will increase as the SEA economies further develop. The turning points for both CO2 and SO2, indicate that the current SEA income level has not reached the turning point. The income elasticities show that income elasticities for CO2 are positive for all 10 countries. Both Singapore and Malaysia are classified as countries with high income. However, Singapore, with 0.64%, has the highest income elasticity, and Malaysia, with 0.15%, has the second lowest. There is no indication that wealthy countries have a significant impact on CO2 through economic development. Income elasticities for SO2 of each country are all negative. This suggests that SO2 is an inferior good. Brunei, with 8.41%, has the most sensitivity toward change in SO2 emissions, whereas Myanmar, with only 0.58%, is the least sensitive to SO2 emissions.

Highlights

  • The connection between the environment and economy has been long debated, and is one of the most controversial issues within the literature of economics

  • The income elasticity of CO2 emissions indicates that CO2 for every individual country in Southeast Asia (SEA) is a normal good

  • This study aims to investigate the hypothesis that there is a relationship between economic development and environmental degradation in Southeast Asia within the years 2003 to 2012

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The connection between the environment and economy has been long debated, and is one of the most controversial issues within the literature of economics. The genesis for EKC was in the early 90’s, when the World Bank, in cooperation with Grossman and Krueger (1991), investigated the impact of free trade policy within Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Their key discovery was that free trade among these countries has boosted their economic development, but left a considerable negative. Pei-Ing Wu, Professor and Chair, Department of Agricultural Economics, National Taiwan University, Taiwan The environmental protection begins as a luxury good in the early economic development stage, and becomes an ordinary good that everybody can afford as economic development progresses (Carson, 2009)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call