Abstract

Storm runoff in basins is comprised of various runoff processes with widely disparate infiltration and storage capacities, such as Hortonian overland flow (HOF), saturated overland flow (SOF), sub-surface flow (SSF), and deep percolation (DP). Areas may be classified according to these various runoff processes based on the soil characteristics, geology, topography, and land-use. This study analyzes changes in runoff components in the Jialu River basin and the Fen River (Jingle sub-basin) during runoff generation from 1980 to 2013 using the runoff segmentation method. Based on the decision scheme, the dominant runoff process (DRP) in the basins was distinguished using geographic information system (GIS) tools. The impact of different runoff process distributions on the changes in the runoff for the basin was determined. The results show that the floods in the Jialu River basin and Jingle sub-basin were dominated by overland flow components. Compared with 1980–1999, the proportion of overland flow components for 2000–2013 in two basins showed a decreasing trend by 8.3% and 7.1%, respectively, while the interflow and underground runoff components increased. In addition, HOF was the DRP in the Jialu River basin and Jingle sub-basin from 2000 to 2013. The area of the rapid runoff processes (HOF, SOF1, and SSF1) in the Jialu River basin and Jingle sub-basin accounted for 89% and 78% of the entire basin, respectively. In contrast, the slow runoff processes (SOF2, SSF2, and DP) accounted for 11% and 22% of the entire basin, respectively. The runoff of the Jingle sub-basin was substantially lower than that of the Jialu River basin under the same rainfall conditions, because of the influence of the distribution of different runoff processes. Compared with the Jialu River Basin, the peak discharge and runoff of Jingle sub-basin were 190.4 m3/s and 2.85 mm lower on average, respectively. The results of this study provide useful information to understand land-use changes and formulate management practices to reduce flooding in the Yellow River.

Highlights

  • Water resources play an important role in life and have extremely high socio-economic significance in different sectors, such as agriculture, industry, trade, food production, and hydropower generation [1].in recent decades, the over-exploitation and reckless use of water resources have created major challenges such as the pollution, depletion, and inequitable distribution of the resource

  • The infiltration capacity of the soil is dependent on soil texture, bulk density, water content, and the number of macropores

  • HOF1 is likely to occur on soils with severe infiltration hindrances, a small number of macropores, and very high clay content, or on bedrock surfaces with low permeability, which is typical of roads and urban areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In recent decades, the over-exploitation and reckless use of water resources have created major challenges such as the pollution, depletion, and inequitable distribution of the resource. This threatens socio-economic development and the natural environment [2,3,4]. The runoff in the Yellow River has significantly reduced, with sudden changes occurring after the 1980s [5,6,7]. Human activities (e.g., Grain for Green Project) and climate change (e.g., changes to rainfall and temperature) are considered to be the key factors causing dramatic reductions in the runoff in the middle reaches of the Yellow. Climatic variation changes the spatio-temporal distribution of global water resources [9], and changes in the underlying surface conditions are one of the driving factors in the short-term [10,11]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call