Abstract

Lineage diversity can refer to the number of genetic lineages within species or to the number of deeper evolutionary lineages, such as genera or families, within a community or assemblage of species. Here, we study the latter, which we refer to as assemblage lineage diversity (ALD), focusing in particular on its richness dimension. ALD is of interest to ecologists, evolutionary biologists, biogeographers, and those setting conservation priorities, but despite its relevance, it is not clear how to best quantify it. With North American tree assemblages as an example, we explore and compare different metrics that can quantify ALD. We show that both taxonomic measures (e.g., family richness) and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (PD) are strongly correlated with the number of lineages in recent evolutionary time, but have weaker correlations with the number of lineages deeper in the evolutionary history of an assemblage. We develop a new metric, time integrated lineage diversity (TILD), which serves as a useful complement to PD, by giving equal weight to old and recent lineage diversity. In mapping different ALD metrics across the contiguous United States, both PD and TILD reveal high ALD across large areas of the eastern United States, but TILD gives greater value to the southeast Coastal Plain, southern Rocky Mountains and Pacific Northwest, while PD gives relatively greater value to the southern Appalachians and Midwest. Our results demonstrate the value of using multiple metrics to quantify ALD, in order to highlight areas of both recent and older evolutionary diversity.

Highlights

  • The evolutionary lineage is a fundamental concept in biology, denoting a group of organisms connected by ancestor-descendent relationships [1]

  • Given that other taxonomic measures of assemblage lineage diversity (ALD) are strongly correlated with species richness (SR), that standardised phylogenetic diversity (sPD) and sum of evolutionary distinctiveness (sumED) show low mean correlations with number of lineages across most phylogenetic depths and that phylogenetic species richness (PSR) does not show a different pattern from phylogenetic diversity (PD), with which it is highly correlated (r = 0.95; Figure 6), we focus below on patterns with respect to SR, PD and time integrated lineage diversity (TILD)

  • For tree assemblages across the contiguous United States, we find that two metrics, which can be derived from temporally calibrated phylogenies, show the greatest average correlation with number of lineages over the full evolutionary history of seed plants, and seem best suited to quantify assemblage lineage diversity (ALD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evolutionary lineage is a fundamental concept in biology, denoting a group of organisms connected by ancestor-descendent relationships [1]. Evolutionary lineages are hierarchically structured; multiple younger evolutionary lineages can be nested within an overarching older lineage, or clade. Multiple genetically diverged lineages can exist within a single taxonomic species, and multiple species can belong to older evolutionary lineages, such as genera, families or orders. Knowing the number of lineages in different ecological assemblages and biogeographic regions gives insights into evolutionary process, biogeographic history, and conservation priorities. An assemblage or region that houses many lineages can be interpreted as having a richer evolutionary history, and may be a greater priority for conservation than one that houses few. The conservation value of lineage diversity has yet to be fully, and persuasively, communicated [2,3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.