Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study investigates the collaborative factors conducive to co‐production in public services, utilizing Ansell and Gash's framework and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) across 18 cases from the Collaborative Governance Case Database (CGCD). It identifies incentive as a necessary condition for co‐production, revealing three sufficient pathways to co‐production: managed, led, and self‐organized co‐production. The findings advance our understanding of the specific collaborative configurations that can achieve higher degree of co‐production, offering an “incentive‐structure‐behavior” framework and practical insights for policy makers seeking to enhance public service co‐production.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
