Abstract

Background: Participatory action research (PAR) provides an opportunity for academic researchers and adolescents to co-conduct research within an area of shared interest. Reciprocal learning occurs as co-researchers acquire research skills and knowledge, and academic researchers gain understanding of the issue being examined, from the perspective of those with lived experience. All members of the research team have a shared responsibility for the research and decision-making processes. PAR has predominantly involved adults as co-researchers. However, in recent years more effort has been made to co-conduct research with adolescents. The aim of this review is to interrogate the practices of academic researchers employing a PAR approach when working along-side disabled adolescents. Methods/design: A critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) will be conducted, allowing for a diverse range of evidence to be drawn from. A systematic search of nine databases, from 1990 onwards, will be conducted first. Reference checking will occur to elicit further relevant data. Following screening, further purposive sampling will be completed to facilitate the development of concepts and theory in line with the on-going analysis and synthesis of findings. Data analysis will involve interpretation of included papers in relation to the principles of PAR and a 'best-practice' framework will be developed. During analysis particular emphasis will be given to the identification of potential social barriers to the participation of disabled adolescents in PAR. Discussion: PAR is widely employed but little is known about its use when working with disabled adolescents. This current CIS will critically question the current practices of academic researchers employing PAR when working along-side disabled adolescents and future research through the best practice framework we will develop.

Highlights

  • It has long been established, in policy and legislation, that children and young people should be given influence in decisions about their lives (Christensen, 2004; UN, 1989)

  • Reciprocal learning occurs as co-researchers acquire additional skills and knowledge, such as research skills, and the academic researcher benefits from an increased understanding of the condition or issue being examined from the co-researcher perspective (Blair & Minkler, 2009)

  • In conclusion, the authors will complete a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) to interrogate the practices of academic researchers employing a Participatory action research (PAR) approach when working along-side disabled adolescents

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has long been established, in policy and legislation, that children and young people should be given influence in decisions about their lives (Christensen, 2004; UN, 1989) This is the case for disabled adolescents who are often marginalised (Kembhavi & Wirz, 2009). Participatory action research (PAR) provides an opportunity for academic researchers and adolescents to co-conduct research within an area of shared interest. The aim of this review is to interrogate the practices of academic researchers employing a PAR approach when working along-side disabled adolescents. Discussion: PAR is widely employed but little is known about its use when working with disabled adolescents This current CIS will critically question the current practices of academic researchers employing PAR when working along-side disabled adolescents and future research through the best practice framework we will develop

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call