Abstract
Abstract This study evaluates the efficacy of Chinese Automated Writing Correction Feedback (AWCF) platforms in enhancing writing performance among Chinese as a Second Language (CSL) learners against the backdrop of emerging generative AI tools like ChatGPT. Employing data from an intermediate CSL course at an Ivy League university, the paper scrutinizes selected Chinese AWCF platforms, such as Meta XiezuoCat, for their accuracy, effectiveness, and instructional potential. The analysis juxtaposes AWCF feedback withChatGPT responses and instructor assessments, revealing both the strengths and limitations of these platforms. The findings indicate that existing Chinese AWCF platforms exhibit noticeable limitations in CFL writing support but hold considerable potential for future development. Despite limitations in current corpus and accuracy compared with Generative AI such as ChatGPT, AWCF’s one-stop service model in error correction significantly reduces the cost of prompt engineering, while its feature of allowing “noticing” can help enhance students’ metalinguistic awareness. This finding also highlights the critical need for AWCF platforms to improve their utility by incorporating expansive and authentic CSL learner data.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.