Exploring the assessors’ and nurses’ experience of formal assessment of clinical competency in the administration of blood components

Abstract

Blood transfusion, clinical competency, assessment, evaluation The change in nurse education from apprenticeship training to the higher education setting, has raised concerns about the lack of practical skills newly qualified nurses have on registration. Every practitioner must be able to administer blood components safely however, the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme have consistently demonstrated that 'wrong blood' incidents are the major cause of morbidity and mortality related to transfusion in the United Kingdom. As a result the SHOT working group have recommended that all practitioners should have their clinical competency formally assessed. This paper describes the development and evaluation of a tool for assessing clinical competency for staff involved in transfusing blood. The evaluation used a triangulated approach of phenomenology and survey. The tool was piloted in two different clinical settings by four registered nurses who each assessed two nurses. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted to collate the nurses' and the assessors' experience of the process. The study participants were of the opinion that assessing clinical competency using a criterion-referenced tool gave practitioners the opportunity to relate theory to practice, promote best practice and encourage adherence to hospital transfusion policies. Formal assessment of clinical competency is therefore, a vehicle that could be used to promote safe transfusion practice, ensuring the safety of patients is paramount.