Abstract

This study evaluates whether imagery and geospatial-based measures show differences between urban and suburban informal settlements. A secondary focus is to determine if these differences are sufficient to characterize an established urban and a newly forming squatter settlement in a suburban area, and what qualities can help identify such areas that may otherwise be overlooked in standard image or land cover classification of human settlements. Comparing a suburban informal settlement in Cobán and an established urban informal settlement in Guatemala City, Guatemala, the research demonstrates that accessibility measures of roads, their surface texture, and geomorphic properties of curvature and slope are significantly different between the two settlements. The ability to understand informal settlement differences from imagery and geographic information systems (GIS) is an important advantage when household surveys and field work are ineffective or not possible. In addition, such understanding can assist in monitoring emerging squatter settlements with remote sensing methods.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.