Exploring perceptions toward home-care robots for older people in Finland, Ireland, and Japan: A comparative questionnaire study

Abstract

PurposeTo clarify potential users’ perceptions toward the development and social implementation of home-care robots in Japan, Ireland, and Finland. MethodsUnsigned, self-administered questionnaires were distributed to adults aged 65 or older, family caregivers, and home-care/health and social care professionals (HSCPs). A total of 1004 responses were collected. ResultsIn Japan, many people were already familiar with robots in their daily lives. The most notable finding about their perspectives on home-care robots was related to safety. Moreover, 93.7 % of the Japanese respondents said, “If the user cannot decide whether to use a home-care robot, family members who know the user well should decide,” followed by 76.4 % in Ireland and 83.1 % in Finland (p < .001). In Ireland, 81.8 % of the respondents said, “I want to help other people and society by participating in the research and development of home-care robots” (Japan: 69.9 %; Finland: 67.5 %) (p = .006). In Finland, many people had a negative impression of robots compared to the other two countries. Finland had the highest percentage (75.4 %) of respondents who said, “Health care professionals should be allowed to use secondary information collected by a home-care robot” (Japan and Ireland: 64 %) (p = .024). Moreover, Ireland and Finland emphasized the need to guarantee the entitlement to receive human care. ConclusionsDevising optimal strategies for the development and social implementation of home-care robots by incorporating various perspectives while valuing human dignity will require examination of each country’s characteristics with respect to history, culture, policies, and values related to robots.