Abstract

This study diagnoses temporal and spatial variations in the performance of different social-ecological systems (SES) in coastal floodplain management in the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta. We go beyond common pool resource management problems and address the management of local public goods. In the assessment, we consider recent developments in the framework initially developed by Elinor Ostrom. The main variables of the framework that we use are resource systems, the environment, the governance system and actors. The focal SES is defined based on guiding questions relating to the definition of the key problem, system boundaries, and action situations. According to our results, the performance of resource systems and the environment deteriorated in 1960–79 compared to the performance prior to 1960. The condition reached a low point during 1980–1999 but improved slightly after 1999. The horizontal network structure of local governance was active until 1960. Due to the introduction of the ‘tidal river management’ approach in the 90 s, the performance of the resource system and the environment has slightly improved, as has the involvement of government and non-government organizations. Our results also show that overall SES performance is comparatively better <in the case of locally managed floodplains than it is for those managed by government agencies. Our new approaches, such as the recent development of the diagnostic framework, the guiding questions for defining focal SES, and application of the framework to local public goods can potentially be used in the fields of sustainability science and SES science. The qualitative performance of each of the selected indicators is useful for identifying intervention options to achieve a sustainable outcome for the coastal floodplain SES.

Highlights

  • Understanding the dynamics of complex human-nature interactions is essential for supporting both human well-being and the sustainable management of resources (Liu et al 2015, Bisaro and Hinkel 2016, Liu et al 2018)

  • We considered four different beels: Beel Bhaina; East Beel Khuksia (BWDB implemented tidal river management’ (TRM)); Beel Kapalia (A nonTRM beel); and Beel Pakhimara

  • We go beyond common pool resource (CPR) management and consider a local public good while using Ostrom’s diagnostic approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the dynamics of complex human-nature interactions is essential for supporting both human well-being and the sustainable management of resources (Liu et al 2015, Bisaro and Hinkel 2016, Liu et al 2018). A SES approach explicitly recognizes the connections and feedback loops linking human and natural systems (Holling 2001, Folke 2006). According to Gunderson and Holling (2002), an SES can be defined as a coherent system of biophysical and social factors that regularly interact in a resilient and sustained manner. Within SES research, a number of theoretical frameworks have been developed. Examples of these frameworks include the social-ecological system framework (SESF) (Ostrom 2007, 2009, McGinnis and Ostrom 2014), the vulnerability framework (Turner et al 2003) and the driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework (EC 1999, Gari et al 2015, Lewison et al 2016). In a comparative study of ten potential frameworks for analysing SES, Binder et al (2013) found that the SESF proposed by Ostrom (2009) provides the option to treat the social and ecological systems at almost equal depth. The subsystems, resource systems and resource units of SESF represent the ecological system, while the governance system and actors represent social systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call