Abstract

Introduction Evaluations of rehabilitation potential are an everyday occurrence, yet the concept is poorly understood and there is a lack of understanding about the reasoning process. This study aimed to explore how occupational therapists and physiotherapists evaluated the rehabilitation potential of older people following an acute hospital admission. Method Focused ethnography was utilised, primarily using observation, interviewing and review of records within one acute medical ward in a general hospital in the United Kingdom. Five patient participants gave consent for their episode of care to be studied, for interactions with professionals to be observed and for their clinical records to be reviewed. Three occupational therapists and two physiotherapists then participated in individual interviews. Findings Thematic analysis of data led to the identification of a four-stage reasoning process. The four stages are as follows: gathering baseline information; provision of curative and supportive interventions; provision and monitoring of rehabilitative interventions; the evaluation of rehabilitation potential and decision about the subsequent pathway. Conclusions The reasoning process illustrates the professional reasoning of occupational therapists and physiotherapists when evaluating rehabilitation potential for older adults in acute care. However, it also highlights vulnerabilities to professional reasoning which may contribute to subjectivity, inconsistency or risk to patients.

Highlights

  • A rehabilitative phase of care in hospital plays a pivotal role in helping older people to recover after an acute admission (Chang &Wang, 2019) and in the aftermath of COVID-19, rehabilitation is becoming the longer-term priority to assist people to recover from lengthy hospital admissions and significant functional decline (Royal College of Occupational Therapists, 2020)

  • Will rehabilitation be the focus for individuals recovering from the COVID-19 illness and associated deconditioning, but the wider population are likely to have broader rehabilitation needs linked to the disruption of normal health and care services (De Biase et al, 2020)

  • Of the six professionals involved in phase two, three occupational therapists and two physiotherapists participated in phase three interviews

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A rehabilitative phase of care in hospital plays a pivotal role in helping older people to recover after an acute admission (Chang &Wang, 2019) and in the aftermath of COVID-19, rehabilitation is becoming the longer-term priority to assist people to recover from lengthy hospital admissions and significant functional decline (Royal College of Occupational Therapists, 2020). The evaluation of rehabilitation potential is said to be an everyday occurrence in hospitals and amongst rehabilitation professionals (Cunningham, Horgan & O’Neill, 2000). Such evaluations help to determine when and if rehabilitation begins, the intensity of rehabilitation required and at what point rehabilitation may fail to deliver meaningful outcomes (Burton et al, 2015). Evaluations of rehabilitation potential are extremely significant for patients, families and professionals and have been linked to the allocation of rehabilitation resources (Zhu et al, 2006; Burton et al, 2015, Arling, Williams and Kopp, 2000). There are examples of the presence of rehabilitation potential being cited as part of service admission criteria (Kotiadis, Carpenter and Mackenzie, 2004) and people being excluded from services on the basis of no rehabilitation potential (National Audit Office, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call