Exploring how enrolment in the TARGET-CTCA clinical trial may modify patient perception of heart health

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation Background The TARGET-CTCA trial aims to determine whether the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin to target computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) improves outcomes in patients presenting to hospital with suspected acute coronary syndrome in whom myocardial infarction has been ruled out. What patients understand of their subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease in this setting, and how intervention with CTCA may influence this is unknown. Purpose To explore how trial participants perceive their heart health and whether this has been modified by trial participation. Methods The TARGET-CTCA trial randomises patients with intermediate high sensitivity cardiac troponin levels to standard care, or CTCA plus standard care. Patients receive CTCA scan results informing them if they have a normal heart or they have mild, moderate or obstructive coronary artery disease. Forty semi-structured interviews were conducted with trial participants across standard care and intervention arms ensuring representation across disease category, age, sex and socioeconomic status groups. Data were coded and organized into themes. Results Emergent themes from the data included insights into attitudes to future health, perception of heart health, and health education needs. While some participants displayed a proactive approach to maintaining health, the consideration of future health goals was often a reactive process in response to the initial chest pain episode or the CTCA findings. While some patients discussed personal responsibility for health maintenance others described a passive approached requiring direct management from a health professional. For some standard care participants, the absence of myocardial infarction was a sign of a healthy heart. Others were left with unanswered questions after the hospital assessment. Confirmation of the absence of coronary artery disease with CTCA gave patients great confidence and a positive change to health seeking behaviour patterns was reported. Patients differed in their interpretation of the terms mild, moderate and obstructive coronary artery disease. This affected their subsequent action with some using the presence of disease as an opportunity to appraise their risk of future cardiac events and begin a preventative approach. Others reported fear and reducing activity to avoid precipitating a possible event. Many patients reported a desire to implement lifestyle changes but did not have the knowledge to do so. Conclusion Exploring how the information contained in participant result letters may contribute to the understanding of risk of future cardiac events has provided valuable information for application of the trial intervention outside of the main trial setting.