Abstract

This paper reports on the results of a pilot study investigating grammatical gender assignment to transparent and opaque inanimate Spanish nouns by Russian-speaking learners with an intermediate-advanced level in L2. 29 Russian natives and 28 native speakers of Spanish completed three gender assignment tasks. Participants had to assign correct gender to inanimate real nouns with transparent (-o, -a) and opaque (-e, consonants) endings, and to nonce words with transparent (-o, -a) or opaque endings. The results revealed that, although the L2 group obtained high accuracy scores in gender assignment tasks, there were significant differences compared to the native speakers. The effects of transparency of the L2 gender system and of the native language of L2 students were also found. Specifically, the L2 students used transparent nouns significantly better than opaque nouns. Furthermore, the L2 group assigned grammatical gender to opaque nouns significantly better when these nouns have the same gender in Russian.

Highlights

  • Grammatical gender is considered a problematic area in Second Language Acquisition (SLA)

  • The results revealed that, the L2 group obtained high accuracy scores in gender assignment tasks, there were significant differences compared to the native speakers

  • The L2 group assigned grammatical gender to opaque nouns significantly better when these nouns have the same gender in Russian

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Grammatical gender is considered a problematic area in Second Language Acquisition (SLA). It is reported to be especially problematic for students whose first language (L1) has no morphological gender assignment rules, such as English, or gender system at all, such as Chinese (Ellis, Conradie, & Huddlestone, 2012; Grüter, Lew-Williams, & Fernald, 2012; Martoccio, 2019; Montrul et al, 2008; Quinn, 2018). Studies with German learners whose native language was Dutch, English or a Romance language have shown that L2 acquisition of grammatical gender is affected by the morphological similarity of gender marking in the L1 and L2 (Sabourin, Stowe, & de Haan, 2006). That is why only L1 learners have access to Universal Grammar (UG) and are able to acquire grammatical features, including gender.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call