Abstract
High altitude rangeland and livelihood systems in Bhutan are undergoing changes in resource availability, population and user rights. This paper explores the existing governance structures of high altitude rangelands in Bhutan using Ostrom’s design principles as a framework for analysis. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were used to capture perceptions of 151 herders, sedentary livestock farmers and government officials across three case study sites. The research showed that most high altitude rangelands in the three case study sites have clear boundaries using natural and manmade landmarks along with a list of eligible users (design principle 1). Herders and livestock farmers have developed customary norms and rules to enforce and engender collective choice agreements for governance of high altitude rangeland (design principle 3). Community guards, appointed on rotational basis, guarded communal pastures against infringement (design principle 4). Herders and livestock farmers have developed graduated penalty system (design principle 5) and they were generally able to resolve most conflicts locally however some were resolved through district courts (design principle 6). However, rights to organize (design principle 7) and a nested enterprise approach (design principle 8) did not feature explicitly in local governance discourses and narratives. Incongruence between provision and appropriation activities under existing governance structures of high altitude rangeland in the case study sites, may be attributed to assignment of incomplete property rights (e.g. lack of management rights) in the bundle of rights. The research demonstrated assigning management rights in the bundle of rights and conformance to design principle 2 are inextricably linked, and vital for sustainable governance of high altitude rangeland. One way to institutionalize Ostrom’s design principles into natural resource governance is formalizing and codifying them in the form of a written group constitution and by-laws. The role of government policies, acts and laws that inform and constrain high altitude rangeland management are explored and changes suggested for improving the current governance system of high altitude rangeland in Bhutan.
Highlights
High altitude rangeland and livelihood systems in Bhutan are undergoing changes in resource availability, population and user rights
This paper explores the governance structures of high altitude tsa-drog under the former property rights regime prior to the introduction of the new Land Act of 2007 in three case study sites in Bhutan using Ostrom’s design principles (DPs) as a framework for analysis
The research demonstrated that Ostrom’s (1990) DPs can be a useful analytical framework to explore the capacity of natural resource governance structures for sustainable governance
Summary
High altitude rangeland and livelihood systems in Bhutan are undergoing changes in resource availability, population and user rights. High altitude rangeland (known as tsa-drog in dzongkha the national language of Bhutan) is integral to yak herding and semi-nomadic yak herders’ livelihoods (Gyamtsho 2002). High altitude tsa-drog includes temperate, sub-alpine and alpine tsa-drog located between 2500 and 5500 meters above sea level (masl). According to Derville and Bonnemaire (2010), high altitude tsa-drog support approximately 38,000 yaks belonging to 1000 herders’ households in 11 of the 20 districts. High altitude tsa-drog are located in remote/inaccessible areas where there are no motorable roads, grid electricity, potable drinking water and other basic civic amenities (Derville and Bonnemaire 2010)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.