Abstract

0513 PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of continuous data provided by Geographic Information Systems (GIS) distances from participants' residences on physiologic outcomes and their relationships between the environmental opportunities for activity. METHODS: The 242 subjects were from a registry of adults 55yrs and older, living in the London area who agreed to participate in an activity program. We included participants who lived less than 4000 meters of any of the available 11 physical activity opportunity (PAO) GIS distances. Baseline physiologic outcomes were used. Multivariate stepwise linear regression modeling was used within three PAO density modes between 300m (close), 300 to 1000m (mid), and over 1000m(far). At times these overlapped when modeling. RESULTS: Multiple correlations of all distances with and without the dependent variables were significantly correlated with each other (Mean(r) = 0.533, .330–.809), suggesting redundancy amongst some individual opportunities. The greatest PAO density was consistently less than 2Km from each resident. Also a pattern of PAO type fell into three density modes used in the modeling to direct explainable variance. “Close” (less than 300m) models included bike and multi-use paths, and parks; “Mid” (300–1000m) models included health clubs, baseball, and tennis; “Far” (over 1000m) models include soccer, dance studios, and golf. Interaction variables were bike*multi and dance*golf. Overall the best models available only provide R2 of 20% or less. The combined distances reduced the redundant information, increasing the explainable variance. A direct relationship between the continuous GIS measures and the outcomes was however not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Given the evidence from the literature and information from our data indicating relatively strong relationships between PAO distance and physiological outcomes, our current hypothesis that there are direct predictors available using the GIS continuous measures is unconfirmed. The challenge of including this novel measure with the traditional categorical descriptions of our target relationships requires additional investigation before we can include it in methodologies of determining and promoting activity older adults.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.