Abstract
In this study we compare glance patterns observed in field experiment driving studies with glance patterns observed in the naturalistic SHRP 2 NEST database. We describe the methodology used to identify appropriate naturalistic epochs and to prepare glances for comparison to field experiment data, and graphically show points of similarity and points of contrast between the two sets of data. Overall, glance patterns observed in field experiments appear to hold in naturalistic data, with a few caveats. Using naturalistic glance data to validate experimentally-acquired glance data appears to show promise and provides confidence for conclusions drawn from behaviors observed in controlled on-road driving scenarios.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
