Abstract

Abstract Existing theory and research highlights emotion control beliefs have important implications for emotion regulation and psychological well-being. Emotion control beliefs can be subdivided into four categories: the extent to which people believe 1) they can control their emotion (self-can beliefs), they should control their emotions (self-should beliefs), 3) others can control their emotions (others-can beliefs), and 4) other should control their emotions (others-should beliefs). To our knowledge, research has yet to examine how developmental factors are associated with emotion control beliefs in adults (i.e., age and non-normative experience of chronic illness). Past research highlights age related differences in emotional processes, and the influence of non-normative chronic illness on emotional well-being. Therefore, the present study utilized data from a lifespan sample of 47 participants (younger adults: n = 21, age range = 19-35, M = 27.55; older adults: n = 26, age range = 68-81, M = 72.40) to examine differences in emotion control beliefs among younger and older adults, people with and without chronic illness, and the interaction between these factors. Our analyses revealed levels of self-can beliefs were lower in people with chronic illness. In particular, younger adults with chronic illness reported the lowest levels of self-can beliefs. By contrast, among people without chronic illness, older adults reported lower levels of others-should beliefs, relative to younger adults. These findings inform theories of emotional aging, development, and health by suggesting emotion control beliefs vary with age and chronic illness.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call