Abstract

It has been well established that supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can significantly enhance the resistance of concrete to chemical sulfate attack. However, the effect of SCMs on the durability of concrete exposed to physical salt attack is still controversial. To date, there have been only limited studies that have investigated this concrete durability issue. Therefore, the present study investigates the effects of using different types of SCMs, including silica fume, fly ash and metakaolin, in concrete subjected to environments prone to physical salt attack. Results indicate that the damage of concrete escalates as the addition level of SCMs increases. An attempt is made to delineate this problem and explain the mechanisms controlling this behaviour, which could have implications for existing design codes. The findings call for caution when SCMs are specified for concrete subjected to environments conducive to physical sulfate attack.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.