EXPLORING DIFFERENTIAL MUTATIONAL DISTRIBUTION BY TARGETED SEQUENCING IN A R‐CHOP TREATED COHORT OF DIFFUSE LARGE B‐CELL LYMPHOMA PATIENTS

Abstract

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) harbors striking clinical and molecular heterogeneity, which continues to encumber risk stratification with a consequently high rate of refractory/relapsed patients (pts). Though the genomic landscape of DLBCL has been comprehensively uncovered, the search for eligible molecular biomarkers continues. Exploratively, we set out to retrospectively evaluate differential mutational distributions in a DLBCL cohort using targeted sequencing. Patients and method: A cohort of 105 de novo DLBCL pts, uniformly treated with first-line R-CHOP, were studied. Thirty pts relapsed, of which 70% had early relapses (<2 years after completing therapy), while 30% had late relapses (≥2 years). Targeted next-generation sequencing (90 gene panel) was applied on archival paraffin-embedded diagnostic samples and, if available, first relapse samples. Results: In total, 118 samples were sequenced, each displaying a median of 12 (range 1–46) putative somatic protein-coding mutations. Germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL (n = 60) displayed a differential somatic signature with enrichment of EZH2, TNFRSF14, BCL2, ACTB, SOCS1, and FAS mutations (Fisher's Exact, p < 10-4), whereas mutations in CDKN2A, PRDM1, MYD88, and CD79B were significantly enriched in non-GCB pts (p < 10-4, n = 44). Survival analysis confirmed inferior overall survival (OS) in non-GCB DLBCL (5-year OS, log-rank (Mantel-Cox), p = 0.01, hazard ratio (HR) 1.7). Pts with double-hit biology (DHB), defined as either MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 fluorescent in situ hybridized positive and/or with MYC and BCL2 immunohistochemical double expression (n = 32), did not display a significant mutational signature or differential OS. However, a subgroup of DHB pts characterized by mutations in MYC, PRDM1, or IRF4 (n = 15) had markedly inferior OS (5-year OS, log-rank, p = 0.0003, HR 3.34) compared to negative non-DHB pts (n = 55) or negative non-DHB/DHB pts (p = 0.0017, HR 2.7, n = 72). Noticeably, ACTB mutations were only present in non-DHB pts. The mutational distribution at diagnosis did not differ between pts with relapse and in sustained remission. However, in the relapse group, GNA13 mutation at diagnosis was more frequent in early relapses than late relapses (43% vs. 0%, Fisher’s Exact without correction, p = 0.03). The presence of GNA13 in the entire cohort showed a trend towards inferior survival. Conclusion: Differential distribution with significant mutational signatures were expectedly found in GCB versus non-GCB, but not in subgroups with DHB or relapse. Interestingly, mutations in MYC, PRDM1 or IRF4 identified a distinct subset of DHB pts with inferior survival. Furthermore, GNA13 mutations were significantly enriched in early relapse pts. These preliminary findings call for validation of GNA13 as a potential marker of early relapse as well as the prognostic value of MYC, PRDM1 and IRF4 mutations in DHB DLBCL. The research was funded by: The Danish Cancer Society and The Vissing Foundation Keywords: aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, genomics, epigenomics, and other -omics, tumor biology and heterogeneity Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract T. S. Larsen Consultant or advisory role Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/BMS Research funding: Genentech