Abstract

PurposeBuilding on previous work, concerned with analysis of pre‐treatment apology letters of men who have offended against children, the current research focuses on post‐treatment apology letters of the same group of men.Design/methodology/approachA total of 26 post‐treatment apology letters of men who attended a community‐based introductory sex offender treatment programme were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to explore how the men conceptualise and understand themselves, their behaviour and their victims after treatment.FindingsThe data suggest that the men express themselves in terms of need, however, primarily this is in terms of pro‐social needs, such as a need for forgiveness, rather than in terms of criminogenic need. The one theme identifiable as a criminogenic need is concerned with sexual needs and very little detail is provided that might explain if the need is not otherwise being met; if there is a sexual preference for children, etc. Thus, from these data, it is not possible to identify a specific target need for treatment related to sexual behaviour.Originality/valueThe results raise the question as to whether criminogenic need is the correct level of analysis for thinking about sexual offending and if treatment programmes that use the language of criminogenic need are an appropriate conceptual fit. The identification of pro‐social needs suggests that interventions may need to include work on what Ward and colleagues have referred to as “personal strivings” in order to have a greater impact on victim empathy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call