Exploring congestion endotypes and their distinct clinical outcomes among ICU patients: A post-hoc analysis

Abstract

BackgroundIn the intensive care unit (ICU) patients, fluid overload and congestion are associated with worse outcomes. Because of the heterogeneity of ICU patients, we hypothesized that there may exist different endotypes of congestion. The aim of this study was to identify endotypes of congestion and their association with outcomes. MethodsWe conducted an unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis on 145 patients admitted to ICU to identify endotypes. We measured several parameters related to clinical context, volume status, filling pressure, and venous congestion. These parameters included NT-proBNP, central venous pressure (CVP), the mitral E/e' ratio, the systolic/diastolic ratio of hepatic veins' flow velocity, the mean diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and its variations, stroke volume changes following passive leg raising, the portal vein pulsatility index, and the venous renal impedance index. ResultsThree distinct endotypes were identified: (1) “hemodynamic congestion” endotype (n = 75) with moderate alterations of ventricular function, increased CVP and left filling pressure values, and moderate fluid overload; (2) “volume overload congestion” endotype (n = 50); with normal cardiac function and filling pressure despite high positive fluid balance (fluid overload); (3) “systemic congestion” endotype (n = 20) with severe alterations of left and right ventricular functions, increased CVP and left ventricular filling pressure values. These endotypes vary significantly in ICU admission reasons, acute kidney injury rates, mortality, and length of ICU/hospital stay. ConclusionsOur analysis revealed three unique congestion endotypes in ICU patients, each with distinct pathophysiological features and outcomes. These endotypes are identifiable through key ultrasonographic characteristics at the bedside. Clinical trial govNCT04680728.