Abstract

AbstractTwo riverside communities in Kolonnawa, Colombo district, and Thawalama, Galle district, of Sri Lanka are flood‐prone communities that, not only have experiences of flood disasters of different scales, but also face a number of disaster risks and vulnerabilities intertwined in their everyday lives. Using a mixed methods approach, the article draws on household surveys, in‐depth interviews and focus group discussions with flood‐affected people, and on semi‐structured interviews with community leaders in the two‐flood‐prone‐communities. The article critically explores how the understanding of disaster risks and vulnerabilities is overly focused on “incapacities,” “weaknesses,” and “victimization” of affected people, and emphasizes that vulnerability should not be treated as an antonym of community resilience. The article argues how community resilience still exists within vulnerable communities and it highlights the need for developing a more holistic approach to understand the vulnerability paradigm and better disentangle the complexity of vulnerability and disaster risk in local contexts.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.