Abstract
Some issues for categorical foundations for mathematics are explored. Among them: how categorical foundations assert the existence of their objects and arrows, and how categorical set theory motivates its own axiom scheme of replacement. Two interpretations of ZF into categorical set theory are explicitly compared. One is homophonic but partial; the other is total and uses membership trees.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
