Abstract

Using an interview-guided survey, our descriptive study aimed to document the extent to which cancer patients perceive they are involved in making treatment decisions and the factors that influence patient involvement. Our study enrolled patients from a Canadian ambulatory oncology program who were undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy, or both, for cancer. The adapted Control Preferences Scale was used to survey perceived and preferred roles in decision-making. The study survey also included items from the Decisional Conflict Scale and the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale. Of 192 participants, 98 (51%) perceived that they were offered treatment choices. Of those 98, 47 (48%) thought that the options were presented equally. Compared with the patients not offered choices, those who were given choices were less passive (4% vs. 29%, p < 0.001) and more satisfied (100% vs. 95%, p < 0.03) in decision-making. Participants whose preferred and perceived roles were different would have preferred more involvement in decision-making. To attain the preferred involvement, patients wanted to receive more information on treatment options, to be given a choice, to have more discussion with the health care team, and to have providers better listen to their needs. Only half of surveyed patients thought that they were offered choices for their cancer treatment. When offered choices, patients were more active in decision-making. Further initiatives are required to determine approaches for supporting patients with cancer so that they can be more involved in decision-making.

Highlights

  • People facing serious illnesses such as cancer have a great stake in the decision-making process

  • To attain the preferred involvement, patients wanted to receive more information on treatment options, to be given a choice, to have more discussion with the health care team, and to have providers better listen to their needs

  • Cancer treatments can result in toxicity, changes in body image, and lifestyle disruptions; cancer screening has the potential for psychological distress, with false positive results 1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People facing serious illnesses such as cancer have a great stake in the decision-making process. Cancer treatments can result in toxicity, changes in body image, and lifestyle disruptions; cancer screening has the potential for psychological distress, with false positive results 1. These potential outcomes are likely to be valued differently by different patients, and guidelines for patient-centred care require that clinical decisions be based on the preferences and values of patients with regard to the outcomes of options [2,3]. Given the need to weigh benefits, harms, and inconveniences across options, patients are likely to experience personal uncertainty about the best option and to require support to participate in decision-making. The extent to which patients are involved in decision-making in ways they prefer and the manner in which they resolve their personal uncertainty are unclear

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call