Abstract

This paper analyzes the notion of possibility in biology and demonstrates how synthetic biology can provide understanding on the modal dimension of biological systems. Among modal concepts, biological possibility has received surprisingly little explicit treatment in the philosophy of science. The aim of this paper is to argue for the importance of the notion of biological possibility by showing how it provides both a philosophically and biologically fruitful category as well as introducing a new practically grounded way for its assessment. More precisely, we argue that synthetic biology can provide tools to scientifically anchor reasoning about biological possibilities. Two prominent strategies for this are identified and analyzed: the design of functionally new-to-nature systems and the redesign of naturally occurring systems and their parts. These approaches allow synthetic biologists to explore systems that are not normally evolutionarily accessible and draw modal inferences that extend in scope beyond their token realizations. Subsequently, these results in synthetic biology can also be relevant for discussions on evolutionary contingency, providing new methods and insight to the study of various sources of unactualized possibilities in biology.

Highlights

  • This paper analyzes the notion of biological possibility and demonstrates how synthetic biology can provide understanding on the modal dimension of biological systems

  • In this paper we have offered an analysis of the interplay between the emerging field of synthetic biology and the notion of biological possibility

  • We have argued for two main points about the role of modal claims in synthetic biology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper analyzes the notion of biological possibility and demonstrates how synthetic biology can provide understanding on the modal dimension of biological systems. Have the prospects of a substantial notion of possibility been contested on philosophical grounds (e.g., Quine, 1953), there are many completely pragmatic reasons that make scientists wary of unnecessary commitments to purely hypothetical entities. The aim of this paper is to argue for the importance of the notion of biological possibility by showing how it provides both a philosophically and biologically fruitful category as well as introducing a new practically grounded way for its assessment. We argue that the new field of synthetic biology can provide tools to scientifically anchor reasoning about biological possibilities, and that a significant portion of the field can be understood as investigating biological modalities

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call