Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR, score 0–3; i.e., “normal” to “severe”) level at birth, and the effects of neonatal energy supplementation (dosed with 2 ml of coconut oil, commercial product or water, or sham-dosed), on post-weaning cognitive abilities of low birth-weight piglets (< 1.1 kg). In total, 184 piglets were recruited at weaning (27 ± 0.1 days) for habituation to the test procedures, and were either tested for spatial learning and memory in a T-maze (n = 42; 37 ± 0.5 days) or for short-term memory in a spontaneous object recognition task (SORT; n = 47; 41 ± 0.3 days). Neonatal supplementation did not affect performances of pigs in the T-maze task or SORT. IUGR3 pigs tended to be faster to enter the reward arm and to obtain the reward in the reversal step of the T-Maze task, suggesting a better learning flexibility, compared to IUGR1 (entry t72.8=2.9, P = 0.024; reward t80 = 3.28, P = 0.008) and IUGR2 (entry t70.3=2.5, P = 0.068; reward t73.9 = 2.77, P = 0.034) pigs. However, a higher percentage of IUGR1 pigs tended to approach the novel object first (DSCF-value = 3.07; P = 0.076) and to interact with it more (t40 = 2.19, P = 0.085), relative to IGUR3 pigs. IUGR1 pigs showed a strong preference for the novel object, as they had a greater percentage time difference interacting with the objects when the novel object was presented (t81 = − 3.41, P = 0.013). In conclusion, some low birth-weight piglets are able to perform a spatial task and an object recognition test, but performances in these tests may be modulated by IUGR level.

Highlights

  • The characteristics of piglets at birth can influence their cognitive abilities

  • This study aimed to investigate the effects of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) levels and neonatal supplementation on the post-weaning cognitive abilities of low birth-weight pigs in a T-maze task and in a Spontaneous Object Recognition Test

  • The results suggest that some low birth-weight pigs, independent of their level of IUGR or neonatal supplementation, are able to learn a spatial task and to discriminate between a novel object and a familiar object

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The characteristics of piglets at birth can influence their cognitive abilities. Some studies demonstrated that low birth-weight piglets (maximum of all studies: 1.05 kg birth-weight) had poorer cognitive abilities than normal birth-weight piglets (average in studies 1.45 kg birth-weight) (Gieling et al 2012; Radlowski et al 2014; Roelofs et al 2018), whereas there is some evidence of no difference (Antonides et al 2015a). Vazquez-Gomez et al (2016) recently found that cognitive abilities of pigs might be modulated by both birth-weight and gender. The study by Roelofs et al (2017) showed that normal birth-weight female piglets performed better than males in a hole-board task

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.