Abstract

BackgroundPatients with atrial fibrillation are at a greater risk of stroke and therefore the main goal for treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation is to prevent stroke from occurring. There are a number of different stroke prevention treatments available to include warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants. Previous network meta-analyses of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation acknowledge the limitation of heterogeneity across the included trials but have not explored the impact of potentially important treatment modifying covariates.ObjectivesTo explore potentially important treatment modifying covariates using network meta-regression analyses for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.MethodsWe performed a network meta-analysis for the outcome of ischaemic stroke and conducted an exploratory regression analysis considering potentially important treatment modifying covariates. These covariates included the proportion of patients with a previous stroke, proportion of males, mean age, the duration of study follow-up and the patients underlying risk of ischaemic stroke.ResultsNone of the covariates explored impacted relative treatment effects relative to placebo. Notably, the exploration of ‘study follow-up’ as a covariate supported the assumption that difference in trial durations is unimportant in this indication despite the variation across trials in the network.ConclusionThis study is limited by the quantity of data available. Further investigation is warranted, and, as justifying further trials may be difficult, it would be desirable to obtain individual patient level data (IPD) to facilitate an effort to relate treatment effects to IPD covariates in order to investigate heterogeneity. Observational data could also be examined to establish if there are potential trends elsewhere. The approach and methods presented have potentially wide applications within any indication as to highlight the potential benefit of extending decision problems to include additional comparators outside of those of primary interest to allow for the exploration of heterogeneity.

Highlights

  • Atrial fibrillationAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common chronic cardiac arrhythmia and patients with Atrial fibrillationAtrial fibrillation (AF) are at a greater risk of stroke [1]

  • The exploration of ‘study follow-up’ as a covariate supported the assumption that difference in trial durations is unimportant in this indication despite the variation across trials in the network

  • The approach and methods presented have potentially wide applications within any indication as to highlight the potential benefit of extending decision problems to include additional comparators outside of those of primary interest to allow for the exploration of heterogeneity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atrial fibrillationAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common chronic cardiac arrhythmia and patients with AF are at a greater risk of stroke [1]. The benefits of NOACs compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular AF has been demonstrated in four large Phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs); ARISTOTLE [6], ROCKET-AF [7], RE-LY [8] and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 [9]. In all of these pivotal studies NOACs demonstrated non-inferior efficacy compared with warfarin for preventing strokes, with similar or more favourable bleeding profiles. Previous network meta-analyses of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation acknowledge the limitation of heterogeneity across the included trials but have not explored the impact of potentially important treatment modifying covariates

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.